<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Research Literacy on New Word Wall</title><link>https://newwordwall.com/topics/research-literacy/</link><description>Recent content in Research Literacy on New Word Wall</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:57:19 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://newwordwall.com/topics/research-literacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How will we evaluate the credibility and 'correctness' of information in the era of AI? The answer isn't so different from the past...</title><link>https://newwordwall.com/journal/evaluating-credibility-era-of-ai/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:06:45 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://newwordwall.com/journal/evaluating-credibility-era-of-ai/</guid><description>As AI-generated summaries reshape how people find information, the old habits of checking sources, context, and evidence still matter.</description></item></channel></rss>